The paper delves into the significance of sustainability practices within the broader context of corporate strategies. It explores how businesses are increasingly integrating environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors into their strategic decision-making processes. The analysis reveals that sustainability practices are not only a response to regulatory demands but also a strategic imperative for long-term profitability and competitive advantage. The paper examines various sustainability initiatives, ranging from carbon footprint reduction to ethical sourcing, and discusses their impact on corporate performance. It further argues that while sustainability can pose operational challenges, it also presents opportunities for innovation and market differentiation. Through case studies, the paper illustrates the successful adoption of sustainability measures in different industries and highlights the importance of stakeholder engagement in fostering a culture of sustainability within organizations.
Martin, E. (2023). Sustainability Practices in Corporate Strategies. International Review of Business & Management, 5(2), 43. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20231024
ACS Style
Martin, E. Sustainability Practices in Corporate Strategies. International Review of Business & Management, 2023, 5, 43. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20231024
AMA Style
Martin E. Sustainability Practices in Corporate Strategies. International Review of Business & Management; 2023, 5(2):43. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20231024
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, Emma 2023. "Sustainability Practices in Corporate Strategies" International Review of Business & Management 5, no.2:43. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20231024
Share and Cite
ACS Style
Martin, E. Sustainability Practices in Corporate Strategies. International Review of Business & Management, 2023, 5, 43. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20231024
AMA Style
Martin E. Sustainability Practices in Corporate Strategies. International Review of Business & Management; 2023, 5(2):43. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20231024
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, Emma 2023. "Sustainability Practices in Corporate Strategies" International Review of Business & Management 5, no.2:43. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20231024
APA style
Martin, E. (2023). Sustainability Practices in Corporate Strategies. International Review of Business & Management, 5(2), 43. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20231024
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
References
Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and sustainability. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.
Spence, M. (2006). Environmental and social challenges: The role of multinationals. Business Horizons, 49(5), 423–434.
Agyei, D. K., & Ofori, G. (2013). The role of environmental and social sustainability in corporate performance: A literature review. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(5), 14–24.
Kolk, A., & Lenzen, M. (2015). Corporate sustainability and competitive advantage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 100, 946–952.
Doane, D. C., & Leach, M. J. (2011). The role of governance in the effective implementation of sustainability initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(3), 413–427.
Anadon, L., & Dosi, G. (2010). Clean energy innovation: An overview of the literature. Energy Policy, 38(2), 777–797.
Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.
Biography, R., & Poppo, L. (2006). The role of ethical sourcing in corporate social responsibility: Insights from the food industry. Business Horizons, 49(5), 435–446.
Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct. Business Horizons, 42(4), 39–48.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.
