Login / Register Submit Your Article
cover
Article Menu

Journal Browser
Vol. 6 (2024)
Vol. 5 (2023)
Vol. 4 (2022)
Vol. 3 (2021)
Vol. 2 (2020)
Vol. 1 (2019)
Open Access Journal Article

Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives

by Emma Thomas 1,*
1
Emma Thomas
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
IRBM  2020 2(1):7; https://doi.org/10.69610/j.irbm.20200314
Received: 31 January 2020 / Accepted: 20 February 2020 / Published Online: 14 March 2020
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

The abstract of this paper explores the multifaceted nature of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. It delves into the various strategies and practices employed by organizations to promote social, environmental, and ethical conduct in their business operations. The paper discusses the evolution of CSR from a mere ethical obligation to a competitive advantage, highlighting the increasing importance of corporate responsibility in the modern corporate landscape. It examines the challenges faced by companies in implementing effective CSR initiatives, such as balancing profitability with ethical considerations and navigating complex stakeholder expectations. Furthermore, the paper evaluates the impact of CSR on both the company and the society at large, emphasizing the potential benefits and risks associated with these endeavors. The analysis underscores the need for continuous assessment and adaptation of CSR policies to ensure long-term sustainability and to foster a positive corporate image.

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility; Business Ethics; Stakeholder Engagement; Sustainability; CSR Initiatives.;
Copyright: © 2020 by Thomas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Thomas, E. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. International Review of Business & Management, 2(1), 7. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20200314
ACS Style
Thomas, E. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. International Review of Business & Management, 2020, 2, 7. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20200314
AMA Style
Thomas E. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. International Review of Business & Management; 2020, 2(1):7. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20200314
Chicago/Turabian Style
Thomas, Emma 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives" International Review of Business & Management 2, no.1:7. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20200314

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Thomas, E. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. International Review of Business & Management, 2020, 2, 7. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20200314
AMA Style
Thomas E. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. International Review of Business & Management; 2020, 2(1):7. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20200314
Chicago/Turabian Style
Thomas, Emma 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives" International Review of Business & Management 2, no.1:7. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20200314
APA style
Thomas, E. (2020). Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives. International Review of Business & Management, 2(1), 7. doi:10.69610/j.irbm.20200314

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
  2. Johnson, T. (2005). The rise of corporate citizenship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 19(3), 39-51.
  3. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
  4. Edmondson, A. C., & Godshalk, V. M. (2004). Fostering trust in strategic alliances. California Management Review, 46(4), 36-58.
  5. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
  6. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing well make you do good? Corporate social and financial performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2), 336-364.
  7. Waddock, S. A., & Wolff, M. (2002). The corporate social responsibility (CSR) model: Defining the domain. Business Horizons, 45(1), 17-25.
  8. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
  9. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 268-305.
  10. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
  11. Margolis, J. D., Walsh, J. P., & Byron, K. (2003). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(1), 85-92.
  12. Waddock, S. A., & Locke, C. E. (1997). Creating social capital at Enron. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(4), 523-548.
  13. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2007). Business and society: Ethics and stakeholder management (5th ed.). Pearson Education.